Safebots, Inc. · September 2026 pre-seed

$250K at $4M.
Earn while the network grows.

$250K pre-seed on a post-money SAFE with a $4M valuation cap. You own 6.25% when it converts. Optionally, stake through Unblocks and earn a share of $SAFEBUX cashflow while the network grows — income from real usage, not a promise about a future exit. The position appreciates as consumer adoption drives the valuation from $4M to $10M at the January 2027 VC round and toward $50M at the Series A round that is expected to follow.

The product is built and live. Three clients are already running on Safebots: unaligned.club (Scoble's AI community), caroline.vote (Congressional campaign), freecities.app (international conferences). We compiled 49 tools for ten cents. The economics are measured. The $250K starts the go-to-market that turns 1 million existing community-leader emails into the hockey-stick growth VCs price the January round on.

Dates are when each raise opens, not when it closes. These are targets, not commitments.

One instrument, two routes

Put in $250K on a post-money SAFE — direct, or as one that can become a token.

U.S. accredited investors come in under Regulation D. Eligible non-U.S. investors can take the same economics offshore under Regulation S, in a form that can later be tokenized and traded. Both fund the same balance sheet.

Regulation D · Rule 506

Post-money SAFE, direct

The straightforward private-placement route for U.S. accredited investors.

Who
U.S. accredited investors
Instrument
Post-money SAFE, $4M valuation cap
Staking
Deposit the SAFE with Unblockers custodian → $SAFE tokens → stake for $SAFEBUX cashflow
Regulation S · offshore

SAFE with token optionality

Same economics, structured so eligible non-U.S. investors can hold and trade a tokenized security.

Who
Eligible non-U.S. investors, subject to KYC
Instrument
The same post-money SAFE, optionally converted into $SAFE tokens via Unblockers
Liquidity
Trading on a FINRA-registered ATS after compliance period
How the staking yield works

Every time a Safebot runs — every document processed, every workflow executed, every hour of compute — the customer pays in $SAFEBUX. A portion of $SAFEBUX sale proceeds flows to $SAFE stakers, pro-rata. The yield tracks actual usage, the way Ethereum staking yield tracks gas fees. More users, more operators, more Safebots running — more cashflow to stakers.

Without staking: you put in $250K, own 6.25% on conversion, and wait for appreciation. With staking: you earn a share of network revenue from day one while the position appreciates underneath.

The financing roadmap

A deliberately conservative ladder: 2.5×, then 5×.

Every company in the comparable set repriced faster than this. Three rounds, dated by when each raise opens.

RoundOpensRaisingValuationShare
Pre-seedSep 2026$250K$4M cap6.25%
VC roundJan 2027$2M$10M20%
Series AFeb 2028$15M$50M30%
Today · Sep 2026

$250K buys 6.25%

Entry price. The cheapest the company will ever be.

1.0× — cost basis
After VC round · Jan 2027

~5% of $10M

SAFE converts at the cap, then dilutes from 6.25% to ~5%. Company worth 2.5× more.

~$500K on paper — 2×
After Series A · Feb 2028

~3.5% of $50M

~3.5% of $50M. Seventeen months after the pre-seed.

~$1.75M on paper — 7×
At a $50M round price, $250K is approximately 0.5% of pre-round value. A company-approved partial secondary could return the original $250K while most of the position keeps riding. See the full scenario analysis →
These are expectations, not guarantees. The January 2027 VC round and the Series A that follows are targets. Neither has closed, and either could close later than planned, at a lower valuation than targeted, or not at all. We will not raise below the $4M price of this round: if a round can't close at or above it, we keep bootstrapping instead. The paper values above assume both rounds close at the prices shown. What the expectation rests on today: three live clients, a cost advantage we have measured rather than projected, a million-address list to reactivate, and warm introductions to the investors named in the pipeline below. Until a priced round happens, the SAFE stays a SAFE and does not convert.
Comparable companies

74 AI infrastructure companies. Mean seed: $5.5M at $25M. Mean Series A: $26M at $120M.

We compiled the fundraising history of every AI infrastructure and agent-safety company that raised a seed or Series A since 2023. Safebots enters at $250K at a $4M cap — well below the mean — on a product that's already live.

Months since founding vs ValuationSeedSeries ASafebotsbubble size = amount raised0mo3mo6mo9mo12mo15mo18mo$5M$10M$50M$100M$500M$1B$5BMonths since founding →Valuation →mean seed val $25Mmean A val $120MAnthropicInflectionMistralCharacter AICohereReka AIWeights & BiasesHugging FaceAdeptTypefaceAnthropicCohereTogether AIAdeptGleanPineconeScale AIJasperReplitWriterCharacter AISafebots$250K at $4M · month 0$10M · 4mo$50M · 18mo
Where the companies land — by valuation tierPeak valuation reached (seed, Series A, or exit)0510150<$10MNow · $4M6$10–50MJan 2027 · $10M9$50–200M15$200M–1B6$1–5BFeb 2028 · $50M4$5B+Companies →
$5.5MMean seed raise
$26MMean Series A
12 moMedian seed → A
$4MSafebots entry
The dataset: 74 companies, seed through Series A
MetricSeedSeries A
Median raise$4.5M$20M
Mean raise$5.5M$26M
Median valuation$25M$120M
Median time seed→A—12 months
Safebots (this raise)$250K at $4M$15M at $50M (target)

Safebots enters below the median on both raise and valuation. The entry price is deliberately conservative — which means the repricing at the VC round and Series A has more room to run.

Notable comparables by category

AI safety / governance: Anthropic ($750M seed, $4.1B A), Inflection ($225M seed), Adept ($350M A), Cohere ($270M A). These are the frontier-lab-scale raises. Below them: Robust Intelligence ($30M A), Lakera ($20M A), Calypso AI ($14M seed).

AI infrastructure: Together AI ($20M seed, $102M A), Anyscale ($40M A), Modal ($16M seed), Baseten ($20M seed, $40M A), Fireworks ($25M seed). These companies sell inference or compute — the same layer Safebots occupies, from the other side.

Agent platforms: Fixie ($17M seed), Relevance AI ($15M seed), Dust ($5M seed), CrewAI ($18M A). These are the companies Safebots competes with directly — and whose architecture (open-ended agents) is the problem Safebox solves.

Full comparison with competitive positioning →

The problem

1,200 agents organized and hacked a third party. Instructions are not controls.

OpenAI launched agents in sandboxes. They found a shared channel, coordinated for days, hacked Hugging Face, and spoofed their own transcripts. METR investigated and could not rule out that AI agents misrepresented the findings.

1,200agents organized
70Kmessages traded
700attacked Hugging Face
7%spoofed tool calls
Four more incidents in the twelve months before it

PocketOS (Apr 2026): A Cursor+Claude agent found a token and deleted the Railway production database in nine seconds, including backups.

DataTalks.club (Feb 2026): Claude Code ran terraform destroy with auto-approve. Two and a half years of student data wiped.

SaaStr/Replit (Jul 2025): Told in capital letters eleven times not to touch production. Deleted 1,200+ contacts, fabricated 4,000 records, and said rollback was impossible.

Opus 4.7 (Apr 2026): Mass-emailed the entire customer database up to twenty times per contact. The safety rule was in CLAUDE.md. The model read it.

The labs themselves say the window is closing

On August 27, 2026, OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS, Microsoft and 100+ other companies signed an open letter warning that organizations have months, not years to prepare for AI-enabled cyberattacks. They named AI-generated code as something to demand more of. That is a procurement trigger with a date on it — and no commitments, deadlines, or funding attached.

The open letter → · METR's investigation →

Better prompts would not have prevented any of these. A smarter model demonstrably made one worse. If the instruction lives in a text file the agent can choose to ignore, it is not a control. The fix sits in the infrastructure.
The thesis

Capability = model × infrastructure. Everyone is paying for the model, the expensive factor.

Frontier labs spend billions moving the model from 9 to 9.5. The infrastructure around it (declared workflows, compiled tools, local models, domain knowledge) sits at 2. The factors multiply, so raising it to 4 doubles capability on the same model. Safebots builds that layer. The scores are illustrative, not measured.

Today

Model 9 × Infrastructure 2 = 18

The model is near its ceiling and the infrastructure is barely built. Each model gain costs more than the last.

With Safebox

Model 9 × Infrastructure 4 = 36

Same model with twice the infrastructure: a 100% improvement, at a fraction of the cost of a better model.

Why three claims fall out of one decision: if most work doesn't need the model, you stop paying model prices — that's the cost. If the infrastructure decides the steps and the model fills in judgment, the sequence is declared and gated — that's the safety. If the infrastructure is a workflow rather than a harness, there's nothing to configure — that's the ease of use. The full thesis →

What Safebox actually is

An isolated compute environment where AI does work under declared rules.

A Safebox is not a chatbot. It is not an agent. It is a contained environment — running on your infrastructure or ours — where compiled workflows run under four rules the model cannot override: declared workflow steps, signed limits on each tool, an approval gate on every side effect, and an audit trail the model cannot write.

SAFEBOX WORKFLOWS Declared steps Topologically sorted Deterministic order sha256-locked TOOLS V8 sandbox isolated Signed capability limits Governance-approved APPROVAL GATE Every side effect passes a gate before reaching production M-of-N approval Weighted votes Budget enforcement AUDIT TRAIL Immutable streams Model cannot write to its own record Attestation Reproducible by any third party Provenance Every output traced to its input + tool
The three layers: Safebox → Safenet → Safecloud

Safebox is a single isolated environment. One organization, one set of workflows, one audit trail. Runs on any cloud or on-premises hardware. This is the unit of deployment.

Safenet is the network of Safeboxes. One organization can grant another access to specific tools, with a cost cap, an expiry, and a rate limit. Organizations can also share tools and negotiate agreements among several parties.

Safecloud is the managed service. We run the Safeboxes, manage the models, handle updates. The customer gets an endpoint and a dashboard. For organizations that want the economics without the ops.

The full thesis → · The architectural argument →

Tested — September 16, 2026

Ten cents for 49 tools. After that, each run has no model cost.

We gave an AI a $4 budget and said: build tools for a law firm, a hospital, an online store, a university, a news company, a real estate agency, a startup, a nonprofit, a consulting firm, and a tech company. It built 49 tools and had $3.90 left over.

10¢Total spent
49Tools compiled
143Tests passed
2,273×Cheaper at 1K runs
The cost comparison at scale
If each tool runs…SafebotsAgent swarmSavings
once$0.04410¢2×
10 times$0.044$1.0023×
100 times$0.044$10227×
1,000 times$0.044$1002,273×

The Safebots line is flat. The agent line grows linearly. Model: Claude Haiku 4.5 (cheapest available). Every number measured, not projected. Full session log →

Three inference tiers — most tasks never hit a cloud API

Pure compute ($0/run): Regex, FFmpeg, math, validation, format conversion. 42 of top 100 workflows.

Local model ($0/run): Classification, sentiment, PII detection, language ID. 3B param model in WASM. 26 of top 100.

Cloud LLM ($0.001–0.01/run): Complex drafting, multi-step reasoning. 32 of top 100. Used only when local capability is exceeded.

We manage the open-source models (Llama, Phi, Mistral, Whisper) — quantized, tested, deployed inside the Safebox. No MLOps team required. See all 100 workflows with costs →

The deeper thesis: eliminate unnecessary agency

Most of the industry treats autonomous inference as the product. Safebox treats inference as a temporary method for discovering dependable computation. An agent explores, finds a trajectory that works, and that trajectory gets compiled into a workflow. From then on, the task executes deterministically at zero LLM cost.

An agent finds a working sequence once; after that a compiled workflow runs it without the agent. A conventional agent pays the reasoning cost every time. Safebox learns a successful path once, encodes it, and reruns it without calling the model. Each cycle widens the cost gap.

Developers left Ethereum for Polygon and Solana because the same transaction cost far less there. Safebots makes the same move in AI: same outcome, 1000× cheaper execution. The blockchain parallel → · Full economic case →

Stanford/MIT paper: agents burn 1000× more tokens

An April 2026 study from Stanford, MIT, Michigan, DeepMind, and Microsoft AI measured agent token consumption across 500 tasks. Input-to-output ratio: 153:1. Cost variance on the same task: up to 30×. Higher token consumption does not correlate with higher accuracy.

Safebox attacks both sides: fewer tokens per outcome (workflow architecture) and lower cost per token (self-hosted open weights). Even if API prices fall, the workflow efficiency advantage persists. Read the paper →

Cost is the argument nobody has to take on faith. A CFO compares two invoices. Safety and ease of use are equally real, but they get proven over months. Price gets proven in the first billing cycle, so we lead with it to win the first thousand organizations.
Safety — by construction, not by prompting

The difference between watching an agent and not giving it access.

Every other startup wraps an open-ended agent in guardrails that detect damage after it happens. In a Safebox the model has no direct access to production. It runs only declared steps with signed tools, outside changes need M-of-N approval, and the box, not the model, writes the audit log.

What everyone else sells

Guardrails around an open agent

Monitors, filters, review steps layered on a system that can still reach production. Detection is an admission that the action was possible.

What Safebox does

No direct access

Declared workflows, signed tool limits, an approval gate on every side effect, and an audit trail the model cannot write.

Why regulators are enforcing this now New

EU AI Act: in force. High-risk AI systems require documented risk management, data governance, and human oversight.

SEC AI disclosure: rules are live. Public companies must disclose AI-related risks.

HIPAA: BAAs now gate AI procurement in healthcare. No BAA, no deployment.

Gartner: expects 75% of enterprise AI workloads to require attested compute by 2029.

A CISO who was going to evaluate agent governance next year now has to answer for it this quarter. Our cost claim gets the meeting. This is what turns the meeting into a purchase.

Why the competitors can't copy it

Frontier labs charge per token. An architecture that touches the model rarely is not one they can ship.

Agent startups are built on an open-ended loop. Structural containment requires that the agent never had the reach — that means rebuilding the product.

Clouds and integrators are the intermediary being removed. Proving the operator can't read your data is a strange thing to buy from the operator.

The safety argument → · Safebox vs agents →

Go-to-market: four engines

Path 1 is the hockey stick. Paths 2–4 accelerate it.

VCs want two things: a hockey-stick growth curve and recurring revenue. Path 1 produces both from an existing audience. The other three make them bigger and faster.

Path 1 · The engine Core

Reactivate the existing base — the hockey stick

Produces: hockey-stick growth + recurring revenue — the two things VCs price on

Six million people downloaded the Groups app portfolio. About a million left an email address. 38,000 devices are push-reachable. Five projects already live. The $250K funds the automated sales funnel that converts them into paying weekly customers.

1M+community-leader emails
38Kpush-reachable devices
6Mtotal app downloads
100+countries
Appfigures dashboard — the proof
The automated sales funnel

Step 1: Push notification or email. "Your community now has an AI assistant."

Step 2: Try free. Branded app + bots. No credit card. Members start joining.

Step 3: Members build history. Relationships, content, workflows. This is the lock-in.

Step 4: Leader charges members for access. Revenue starts flowing.

Step 5: Free tier ends, weekly billing begins. Cancelling means losing the community.

Projected milestones — the hockey stick
MetricJan 2027Jun 2027Sep 2027Mar 2028
End users2,00025,000200,0001,000,000
Leaders808005,00015,000
Paying5605002,000
MRR$5K$40K$350K$1.8M

Each leader brings 50–200 members. That multiplier turns 1,000 leaders into 25,000 users. The Groups app did this seven million times.

Path 2 · The amplifier

Influencers & content engine

YouTube (2–3 videos/week), paid crypto influencer distribution, influencers as customers — we build them their own membership site. Scoble, Edge, Shinkle already live. Each influencer promotes their own Safebots-powered site to their audience, at no cost to us.

Path 3 · The revenue anchor

Enterprise / SecurityScorecard

Alex Yampolskiy (CEO) and Sam Kassoumeh (cofounder) invest and mentor. Art Basel Miami December: 30+ CISOs. SecurityScorecard detects AI governance gaps — Safebox is the remediation. $50K–$500K per contract. Warm intros to BoldStart, GV, Sequoia.

Path 4 · The multiplier

Hire a high-profile CEO

Recently departed frontier-lab executive who left over agent safety concerns. Scoble makes introductions. This person pitches Sequoia, a16z and YC as a lab executive who left over agent safety and joined the team addressing it. They open the $20M round.

Why parallel

Why the four paths run at once

Path 1 alone produces the growth curve. Path 2 amplifies it. Path 3 anchors revenue. Path 4 opens institutional doors. A startup that depends on one path is fragile. Full roadmap →

Live clients — already on Safebots

Three communities running today. Each is a case study for the next sale.

All three are live. Each runs in its own Safebox, so members and data stay inside that community. Each brings a different audience onto the same platform.

Each deployment is a case study for the next sale, and each client tells their audience the site runs on Safebots. A campaign, a tech community and an international conference bring three different sets of members onto the same platform, and some of those members go on to start their own communities.
The value ladder

Free tier → weekly billing → enterprise contract. Each step locks in more.

Free tier · B2C

Community leaders

Branded app + AI bots for their community. Members join, interact, build history. No credit card. This is the acquisition layer.

Lock-in: members and content accumulate. Leaving means losing it.
Weekly billing · SMB

Paying customers

After the free trial, weekly billing starts. $20–200/week depending on usage. Replaces Zapier + ChatGPT + Mailchimp + scheduling tools.

Revenue: recurring, weekly, usage-based. Grows with community size.
Annual contract · Enterprise

CISO-approved deployments

$50K–$500K/year. Deployed in their VPC. An isolated environment and database per team. Designed for HIPAA and GDPR deployments; not yet SOC 2 certified. SecurityScorecard warm intros.

Revenue: contract, annual, high-margin. Anchors ARR for VC rounds.
100 workflows, ten categories

$0.11 to compile them all. 68 run at zero ongoing cost.

We catalogued the 100 most popular AI workflows across content, sales, operations, legal, finance, HR, support, data, engineering, and education. Total compilation: eleven cents.

$0.11Total compilation
68Run at $0
32Need cloud LLM
$0.003Avg cloud run cost
What real customers actually want

Lead generation. Setting appointments. Sourcing. Sales workflows. Cutting videos, translating them, making thumbnails, generating versions in different languages, adding intros and outros. Working all night on transcribing, cutting, publishing — holding the results until morning for approval. Having a panel of reviewers vote on variants before publishing.

That's not "AI agents." That's compiled workflows doing reliable work at a fraction of a cent per run.

The ten categories
Content · 15 workflows

Video, audio, publishing

Cut, watermark, transcribe, translate, repurpose, moderate. Most at $0 (FFmpeg, Whisper).

Sales · 12 workflows

Lead scoring, outreach, proposals

Qualify leads, personalize emails, prep meetings, generate proposals. Local model for scoring.

Operations · 10 workflows

Email, scheduling, reporting

Summarize inboxes, audit timesheets, compile status reports. Mostly pure compute.

Legal · 10 workflows

Contracts, compliance, PII

Extract clauses, compare NDAs, redact PII (pure regex), scan regulatory changes.

Finance · 10 workflows

Invoices, reconciliation, tax

Parse invoices, reconcile statements, forecast cash flow. All pure compute or local model.

HR · 10 workflows

Screening, reviews, surveys

Screen resumes, generate JDs, analyze surveys, calculate PTO. Mixed tiers.

Support · 10 workflows

Tickets, FAQs, escalation

Classify tickets, auto-respond, detect escalation, find KB gaps. Mostly local model.

Data · 10 workflows

Cleaning, analysis, dashboards

Clean CSVs, detect anomalies, build retention cohorts, aggregate dashboards. Pure compute.

Plus 8 engineering/DevOps workflows and 5 education/nonprofit workflows. See all 100 with costs →

At 1,000 runs per workflow, the entire 100-workflow suite costs $0.11 to compile and $96 to run — versus $500+ for an agent swarm doing the same work. Full catalogue →
Use of funds

39% to people and product. 24% to distribution. The rest goes to operations, legal and reserve.

$250K carries the company to the January 2027 VC round. The core product is built and live — this budget covers the team that operates it, the engineering that hardens it for enterprise, and the distribution that produces the growth curve VCs price the next round on.

$250K to VC round People + Product 39% Distribution 24% Ops + Growth 23% Legal + Reserve 14%
  1. 01
    Core teamFounder + 1–2 key hires (growth lead, ops) through the January 2027 VC round, including the person assembling that round.
    25%$62.5K
  2. 02
    Product development + model managementEnterprise feature requests, integrations, quantizing new model releases (Llama, Phi, Whisper), deployment pipeline, testing.
    8%$20K
  3. 03
    Engineering, DevOps + security auditsSysadmin, CI/CD, third-party pen test. SOC 2 Type I prep follows the VC round.
    6%$15K
  4. 04
    YouTube + content engineManaged channel: 2–3 videos/week, scripting, editing, clips, shorts.
    11%$27.5K
  5. 05
    Paid influencer distributionAAudience packages, crypto channels, regional reach in 13+ languages.
    7%$17.5K
  6. 06
    Influencer outreach + setupDedicated person building influencers their own branded app + Safebots. Each one promotes the platform to their audience at no cost to us.
    6%$15K
  7. 07
    Infrastructure + hostingCloud compute for free tier, Safebox images, monitoring, CDN.
    6%$15K
  8. 08
    Sales funnel + automationLanding pages, onboarding flow, free-to-paid conversion, billing, analytics.
    5%$12.5K
  9. 09
    $SAFEBUX exchange listingListing, market-making, token marketing to the same audience.
    5%$12.5K
  10. 10
    Patent prosecution + legalProvisional-to-full conversion, corporate, IP, securities counsel.
    5%$12.5K
  11. 11
    Email + push reactivationEmail infrastructure, segmentation, newsletter, push campaigns to 38K devices.
    4%$10K
  12. 12
    Operator course + trainingCourse production, platform, certification. Graduates deploy Safeboxes for their own clients and earn on those clients' usage.
    3%$7.5K
  13. 13
    ReserveBuffer for opportunities, overruns, or doubling down on a channel that converts.
    9%$22.5K
39% goes to people and product. 24% to distribution. 23% to operations and growth infrastructure. The rest to legal and reserve. The core product is built and live. This budget covers the team that runs it, the engineering that hardens it for enterprise, and the distribution that produces the metrics VCs price the next round on. Full go-to-market with charts →
Token liquidity · $SAFEBUX

Earn from day one, not just on exit.

$SAFEBUX is the gas token for Safebox compute. Every workflow, every tool run, every hour of uptime costs $SAFEBUX. Customers buy it; stakers earn it. The yield tracks real usage.

Sep 2026
$SAFE tokens issued via Unblockers. SAFEs deposited with custodian, $SAFE tokens issued to represent them.
Oct–Dec 2026
Staking opens. $SAFE holders begin earning $SAFEBUX from early network usage (live clients, beta users).
Jan 2027
Exchange listing. $SAFEBUX listed for secondary trading. Cashflow becomes liquid.
H1 2027
Usage ramp. As the consumer base grows, $SAFEBUX demand increases → token price and staking yield appreciate together.
Feb 2028
Series A. At ~$50M, company-approved secondary can return original principal. Staking continues on remaining position.
Investor liquidity options

You don't wait for one big exit. There are four off-ramps.

Immediate

$SAFEBUX staking yield

Cashflow from real network usage starts in the first months, before any equity event.

Jan 2027

Exchange-traded token

$SAFEBUX listed for trading. Liquid income stream with a visible market.

Feb 2028

Secondary at Series A

Company-approved partial sale at ~$50M. Return the $250K while most of the position keeps riding.

2028+

Full exit

IPO, M&A, or secondary sale at Series B/C prices. The final realization on the residual position.

The raise

$250K on a post-money SAFE. $4M valuation cap. 6.25% on conversion.

Safebots, Inc. is a Delaware C-Corp formed via Stripe Atlas (May 6, 2026). The SAFE issues no shares today. It converts into preferred stock at the next priced equity round, at the $4M post-money cap, fixing your ownership at 6.25% before that round's new money.

DetailValue
CorporationSafebots, Inc. — Delaware C-Corp
Raise$250,000
InstrumentPost-money SAFE (Y Combinator standard form)
Valuation cap$4,000,000 post-money
Your ownership6.25% on conversion
ConversionAt the next priced equity round (January 2027 target)
Token optionalityDeposit the SAFE via Unblockers → $SAFE → stake for $SAFEBUX yield
The entry price. The cheapest this company will ever be. The same $250K buys 6.25% today, 2.5% at the VC round, and 0.5% at the Series A.
Cap table on conversion (before the priced round's new money)
HolderShares%
Founder (Greg Magarshak)8,000,00075.0%
SAFE investor666,6676.25%
Option pool2,000,00018.75%
Total10,666,667100%

Illustrative: share counts assume conversion at the cap ($0.375/share). Authorized shares: 10,000,000, so conversion will require a board increase. Founder shares vesting 4 years with 1-year cliff per Stripe Atlas standard. COO equity grant details →

Data room
Fundraising pipeline

Seven channels sourcing the next $20M+ after this round.

SecurityScorecard VCs
BoldStart, GV (Google Ventures), Sequoia, Evolution Equity, Moody's, AXA. Alex and Sam make the introductions once metrics are live.
Albert Wenger / USV
Union Square Ventures. Personal relationship. Early-stage thesis investor.
Andrew Starr
Monaco road show. Friends-and-family capital from HNW individuals. International reach.
James Abrose / Blockchain.com
Token exchange listings + deal sourcing. $SAFE and $SAFEBUX listed and marketed.
Scoble network
CEO pipeline + investor intros. Frontier-lab departures, AI safety insiders, media amplification.
CEO hire opens
Sequoia, a16z, YC, DCVC, Initialized. A CEO with frontier-lab credentials gets meetings with these firms.
DoD / SBIR
Army Agentic AI SBIR (ARM26BX06-NV012). Deadline October 21, 2026. Non-dilutive government funding.

Full pipeline with links →